Science And Religion, The Results Of An Absurd Discussion

The conflict between science and religion is typical, classic and also incorrect. People go to extremes in the discussion between science and religion. In such a way that you have to choose one and hate the other. You see all forms of absurd reasoning on social media. And there are already many forms of injustice, but there are even more attacks on people who hold different beliefs.

In a dispute there is always a loser. The same goes for the people involved in the discussion between science and religion. Still, the sense of loss in a debate can be subjective. In the end, it doesn’t matter how many losers there are. No one is convinced and nothing has been clarified. Never does anyone change sides or question their original position.

The discussion between science and religion

We want to show you some of the arguments that people use the most in this debate. We also want to talk about the two sides of the issue that you can find on any forum or social media platform. The defenders of science claim that religious people are wrong because the data from the holy books is not true. For example, those who go against the teachings of Christianity often point to the myth of creation. This story tells how God created the first man and how the first woman came into existence from this man’s first rib.

Some people want to discredit those who believe in the theory of evolution. They point to the impossibility that man descended from an ape. This absurd debate has arisen from misinterpretations and is one of the most frequent. It is true that some people do not understand evolution. But there are other people who take the Bible literally and avoid the written metaphors.

Historical figures and religion

The religion of famous historical figures is yet another controversial topic. The defenders of science but also the defenders of faith mention philosophers, chemists, physicists and countless famous people who believed or did not believe in God. Some people believe that religious scientists are the best. Others believe in atheists. But they only mention famous people because they are important. They rarely talk about scientists who have made great strides in religion.

On the other hand, many people regard science as the faith of our time. And if that weren’t enough, there are religious people who use scientific arguments to prove the existence of God. Of course, any argument to prove the existence of God or to the contrary, falls through the basket without solving anything.

How should we interpret these discussions?

These kinds of discussions lack reflection and thinking. They are only trying to discredit the opponent. These debates take place on the internet and not through face-to-face contact. That gives people more freedom to express themselves without any reservations. The so-called anonymity that the internet provides makes the subject of the attack even more erratic and impersonal. When someone criticizes a religious or scientific opinion, they are not attacking a specific person. They attack a general person or idea. But these kinds of discussions can develop into situations that people take personally.

This process fosters an environment in which the arguments become increasingly ridiculous and far removed from the main topic. Science and religion are compatible. There are different points of view that bring them together. The opinions that seem irreconcilable come from the people who focus on the discussion without listening to the other side. Or they consider as their only interpretation that point of view most closely associated with criticism.

Modern views on science and religion.

It is important that we remember that science is a method. You can think of it as an instrument that helps us to understand the world. But the science isn’t perfect. The method is not perfect either. The same goes for the people who practice science. Their conclusions may be biased or false. There are many aspects of life that are beyond the reach of science. But that doesn’t mean we should just accept any old theory and fall victim to absolute relativism.

On the other hand, religion fulfills certain functions that people with a superficial view of the world often overlook. Religion helps people to unite. It relieves the tension and fear that surround death. In addition, it encourages generosity and sharing. Sometimes religion is based on erroneous or false ideas. But they are not bad in and of themselves. What makes them bad is usually the people who interpret the religion in a certain way.

Unknown dimensions

The scientist Carl Sagan gave a practical example of how science is unable to interpret everything. Sagan said we should look at the world in two dimensions. In this world, all inhabitants are flat squares. One day a ball suddenly appears in this world. The flat inhabitants can’t see it because the ball is floating in the air. But then one day the ball bounces on the floor and leaves a circular imprint. The residents cannot overcome their surprise.

This story may sound absurd. But it helps us to reconsider the idea of ​​unknown dimensions. We don’t know everything and we won’t know. That is why it is important to think critically without despising those who think differently. That will help us avoid a ridiculous discussion. A lack of respect only creates conflict and drives people apart. Dialogue and understanding promote reconciliation and coming together.